Summary:
Focusing on modern
advertisements, women are most commonly used to advertise most of the products
we see on TV, hear on the radio, see on billboards, etc. Although women are the
more commonly targeted demographic for products like yogurt, clothing, and cereal
and are used for the advertising of these products, women are also used for the
advertising of products not commonly used by women: car parts, heavy duty
tools, etc. (Lowen, 2008). Such
advertisements with the objectification of women don’t even phase society in
this day in age; people are so used to being surrounded by it constantly.
This is nothing new, objectifying women for advertisements
unrelated to them dates back to the 1950s. Pin Up images were found in calendars
meant to advertise tools for a male-targeted demographic during this time
period (Lowen, 2008). Pin ups often became famous through this type of
advertising. Pin Up girls usually gained even more fame through their images
that accentuated their strongest features and “hid” their weaker ones (Lowen,
2008).
Many people reacted to images of Pin up girls created by
painters with a negative opinion, believing that the images were unrealistic
depictions of what the ideal woman should aspire to look like because that was
the woman that men fantasized about. There is no doubt that the earlier Pin Up
images that were painted, not photographed, were altered and unrealistic. A
painter of Pin Up girls himself stated that he “felt
the ideal pin-up was a fifteen-year-old
face on a twenty-year-old body” (Lowen, 2008). Today’s “Pin Up” girls (not
identified as such anymore) are more commonly photographed rather than
drawn/painted. Still altered, these photographs are said to be more believable because
of the power of Photoshop/digital altering, and not as capable of being
perceived as more imaginative yet reality-based such as the painted images from
the 30s, 40s, and 50s (Lowen, 2008).
Whether it be the painted images of Pin Up girls or the
photographs of Pin Up girls (both having been altered as an unrealistic
depiction of a woman), a concern has risen. A “dangerous trend” supposedly
exists and is leading to the development of eating disorders among young women
because of obsessions, accusingly created by these images, of how people view
them and their bodies. “A steady diet of exploitative, sexually
provocative depictions of women feeds a poisonous trend in women's and girl's
perceptions of their bodies, one that has recently been recognized by social
scientists as self-objectification -- viewing one's body as a sex object to be
consumed by the male gaze” (Lowen,
2008).
Analysis:
This article has an overall negative
outlook on Pin Up images, not only of today, but from the early and mid 1900s
as well. It’s been proven that images in the media can be a major factor in
depression and eating disorders amongst young women. It’s a fact that the
images today are extremely altered, touched, and retouched to the point where
the ensuing image is one of a woman that does not exist. Yet society is
brainwashed, and even knowing this information, girls will see these images and
still feel they must strive to look this way, though it’s impossible, in order
to be “pretty” or “desired”. Not to mention the fact that these images
encourage that girls have to feel that they must be “pretty” or “desired” at
all, making it seem like that’s everything
and all they are worth being a female. Having that type of mentality that
society has created amongst many women is very dangerous and is only getting
worse by the decade.
The article makes a point to mention that the painted
pictures of Pin Up girls in the 30s, 40s, and 50s are altered, yet we’re able
to “recognize them as images created from the
imagination, even if they're based on life,” (Lowen, 2008) making
it seem like what we have today is much worse. Either way, both are images of “fake”
women, so to speak, and produce the same effect on women, today’s images are
just more realistic because of the advancement in technology and are more
thrown in your face. It’s important to remember the photographs, not paintings,
of Pin Up girls from the early-to-mid 1900s, though. These images were barely
tweaked like they are today and the ideal of what was considered beautiful and
sexy was far more “voluptuous” in that time period. The ideal image of a woman
has changed, which must be kept in mind. The photographs taken of women in that
time period were natural and healthy in comparison to those of today, which are
altered to be unhealthily skinny and with man-made body parts. So in that
respect, it wasn’t such a terrible thing for girls to look at images of these
women and strive to look like as they do because that was a reachable goal of a
real woman.
Reflection
Questions:
1.
What
made painters of the first Pin Up girls create a “unrealistic” depiction of a
woman to be considered ideal?
2.
What
was the true cause of “the dangerous trend” (self-objectification), was it the
Pin Up girls originally painted, the photographs we are only now seeing in the
most recent decade, or is there a possible other cause?
Lowen, L. (2008, August
14). Using women's bodies to sell - pin-up girls, objectification
of women, and self-objectification. Retrieved from
http://womensissues.about.com/b/2008/08/14/using-womens-bodies-to-sell-pin-up-girls-objectification-of-women-and-self-objectification.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment